2000 • Daewoo
Musso
Daewoo Musso 2.9 TD (129 Hp) 2000Overall Score53.25/100
2000 Daewoo Musso vs 1997 Opel Campo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1997 • Opel
Campo
Opel Campo 3.1 TD (109 Hp) 1997Overall Score52.25/100
WINNER
Daewoo Musso
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
53.25–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Daewoo MussoSpecificationOpel Campo
DaewooMakeOpel
MussoModelCampo
2000Model year1997
Off-road vehicleBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Daewoo MussoSpecificationOpel Campo
16,0 s0–100 km/h16,9 s
160 km/hTop speed155 km/h
2874 ccEngine displacement3059 cc
129 HPPower109 HP
260 NmTorque255 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Daewoo MussoSpecificationOpel Campo
DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank0 lt
12 ltUrban consumption—
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption12,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Daewoo MussoSpecificationOpel Campo
4640 mmLength4980 mm
1864 mmWidth1690 mm
1735 mmHeight1710 mm
1850 KgWeight—
2630 mmWheelbase3025 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Daewoo Musso and 1997 Opel Campo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Daewoo Musso leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSDaewoo Musso vs Daewoo Musso1999 and 2000 model yearsImage unavailableVSSsangYong Musso vs Daewoo Musso1999 and 2000 model years
VSMitsubishi Pajero vs Daewoo Musso1999 and 2000 model years
VSDaewoo Korando vs Daewoo Musso1999 and 2000 model years
VSJeep Cherokee vs Daewoo Musso2000 and 2000 model yearsComments are loading…