DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Daewoo Musso vs 1995 Ford Maverick Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Maverick

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

52.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DaewooMakeFord
MussoModelMaverick
1995Model year1995
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

16,0 s0–100 km/h13,2 s
160 km/hTop speed160 km/h
2874 ccEngine displacement2389 cc
129 HPPower124 HP
260 NmTorque197 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank72 lt
12 ltUrban consumption13 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
—Average consumption11,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
235/75 R15Tyre size215/80 R15 R
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4640 mmLength4105 mm
1864 mmWidth1735 mm
1735 mmHeight1805 mm
1850 KgWeight1620 Kg
2630 mmWheelbase2450 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Daewoo Musso and 1995 Ford Maverick approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Maverick leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…