DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Daewoo Musso vs 1999 GAZ 31 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Daewoo Musso

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

40.5–39.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Daewoo MussoSpecificationGAZ 31
DaewooMakeGAZ
MussoModel31
2000Model year1999
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Daewoo MussoSpecificationGAZ 31
21,0 s0–100 km/h23,0 s
143 km/hTop speed135 km/h
2874 ccEngine displacement2445 cc
98 HPPower90 HP
191 NmTorque172 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Daewoo MussoSpecificationGAZ 31
DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
12,5 ltUrban consumption—
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Daewoo MussoSpecificationGAZ 31
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/75 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

Daewoo MussoSpecificationGAZ 31
4640 mmLength4870 mm
1864 mmWidth1800 mm
1735 mmHeight1422 mm
1815 KgWeight1401 Kg
2630 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Daewoo Musso and 1999 GAZ 31 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Daewoo Musso leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…