DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Daewoo Musso vs 1996 Land Rover Defender Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Land Rover Defender

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

53.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DaewooMakeLand Rover
MussoModelDefender
1996Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h18,1 s
176 km/hTop speed129 km/h
2295 ccEngine displacement2496 cc
140 HPPower113 HP
196 NmTorque265 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
16,4 ltUrban consumption—
10 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption10,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
255/70 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4640 mmLength4590 mm
1864 mmWidth1790 mm
1735 mmHeight2059 mm
1890 KgWeight2055 Kg
2630 mmWheelbase2794 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Daewoo Musso and 1996 Land Rover Defender approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Land Rover Defender leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…