2002 • Daewoo
Musso
Daewoo Musso 2.0 i 16V (126 Hp) 2002Overall Score50.25/100
2002 Daewoo Musso vs 2002 Daewoo Rezzo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Daewoo
Rezzo
Daewoo Rezzo 2.0 i (128 Hp) 2002Overall Score50.5/100
WINNER
Daewoo Rezzo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
50.25–50.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Daewoo MussoSpecificationDaewoo Rezzo
DaewooMakeDaewoo
MussoModelRezzo
2002Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Daewoo MussoSpecificationDaewoo Rezzo
18,0 s0–100 km/h12,4 s
168 km/hTop speed104 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
126 HPPower128 HP
177 NmTorque176 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Daewoo MussoSpecificationDaewoo Rezzo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank60 lt
16,4 ltUrban consumption15,1 lt
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption8,2 lt
—Average consumption10,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Daewoo MussoSpecificationDaewoo Rezzo
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
235/75 R15Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Daewoo MussoSpecificationDaewoo Rezzo
4640 mmLength4350 mm
1864 mmWidth1750 mm
1735 mmHeight1580 mm
1890 KgWeight1392 Kg
2630 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Daewoo Musso and 2002 Daewoo Rezzo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Daewoo Rezzo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…