DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Daewoo Matiz vs 2003 Smart Roadster Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Smart Roadster

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DaewooMakeSmart
MatizModelRoadster
2005Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
4Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

15,3 s0–100 km/h10,9 s
152 km/hTop speed175 km/h
995 ccEngine displacement698 cc
64 HPPower82 HP
87 NmTorque110 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
38 ltFuel tank35 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption6,3 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
155/65 R13Tyre size185/55 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

3495 mmLength3427 mm
1495 mmWidth1615 mm
1485 mmHeight1192 mm
826 KgWeight790 Kg
2340 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Daewoo Matiz and 2003 Smart Roadster approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Smart Roadster leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…