1996 • Daewoo
Espero
Daewoo Espero 2.0 i (105 Hp) 1996Overall Score53.25/100
1996 Daewoo Espero vs 1996 Fiat Croma Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Fiat
Croma
Fiat Croma 1996Overall Score52.25/100
WINNER
Daewoo Espero
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
53.25–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Daewoo EsperoSpecificationFiat Croma
DaewooMakeFiat
EsperoModelCroma
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Daewoo EsperoSpecificationFiat Croma
12,8 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
185 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1929 cc
105 HPPower94 HP
169 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Daewoo EsperoSpecificationFiat Croma
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank70 lt
11,6 ltUrban consumption6 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption5,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Daewoo EsperoSpecificationFiat Croma
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Daewoo EsperoSpecificationFiat Croma
4615 mmLength4520 mm
1718 mmWidth1760 mm
1388 mmHeight1430 mm
1130 KgWeight1240 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2660 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Daewoo Espero and 1996 Fiat Croma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Daewoo Espero leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…