DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Daewoo Damas vs 1996 Perodua Nippa Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Perodua Nippa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

37.5–38.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DaewooMakePerodua
DamasModelNippa
2000Model year1996
MinivanBody typeHatchback
2Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

24,5 s0–100 km/h16,0 s
0 km/hTop speed132 km/h
796 ccEngine displacement659 cc
38 HPPower31 HP
64 NmTorque49 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
37 ltFuel tank32 lt
—Urban consumption5,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,7 lt
—Average consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size145/70 R12
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3230 mmLength3395 mm
1400 mmWidth1395 mm
1920 mmHeight1410 mm
—Weight650 Kg
1840 mmWheelbase2280 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Daewoo Damas and 1996 Perodua Nippa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Perodua Nippa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…