DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Daewoo Damas vs 1995 Daewoo Tico Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Daewoo Tico

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

37.5–38.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DaewooMakeDaewoo
DamasModelTico
2000Model year1995
MinivanBody typeHatchback
2Seats4
3Doors5

Performance

24,5 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
0 km/hTop speed143 km/h
796 ccEngine displacement796 cc
38 HPPower48 HP
64 NmTorque64 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
37 ltFuel tank30 lt
—Urban consumption6,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size135 R12
YesABS—

Dimensions

3230 mmLength3340 mm
1400 mmWidth1400 mm
1920 mmHeight1395 mm
—Weight640 Kg
1840 mmWheelbase2335 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Daewoo Damas and 1995 Daewoo Tico approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Daewoo Tico leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…