2024 • Dacia
Duster
Dacia Duster Journey 2024 1.3 Turbo 150 HPOverall Score74.75/100
2024 Dacia Duster vs 2016 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Land Rover
Range Rover Evoque
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Range 2.0 TD4 (180 Hp) 2016Overall Score80.75/100
WINNER
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 6 points.
74.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Dacia DusterSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover Evoque
DaciaMakeLand Rover
DusterModelRange Rover Evoque
2024Model year2016
SUVBody typeSUV, Crossover
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Dacia DusterSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover Evoque
9,7 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
199 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1332 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
150 HPPower180 HP
250 NmTorque430 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Dacia DusterSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover Evoque
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank54 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption5,5 lt
6,0 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption4,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dacia DusterSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover Evoque
4x2Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
EDCTransmission—
17Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Dacia DusterSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover Evoque
4341 mmLength4371 mm
1804 mmWidth1985 mm
1693 mmHeight1660 mm
1338 kgWeight1665 Kg
478 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2660 mm
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2024 Dacia Duster and 2016 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque leads the E-Kıyasla score by 6 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…