DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Dacia Duster vs 2016 FAW Besturn B50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Dacia Duster

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DaciaMakeFAW
DusterModelBesturn B50
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
170 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
114 HPPower139 HP
145 NmTorque172 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Petrol / LPGFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank58 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption—
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
215/65 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4315 mmLength4615 mm
1822 mmWidth1785 mm
1625 mmHeight1435 mm
1205 KgWeight—
2673 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Dacia Duster and 2016 FAW Besturn B50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Dacia Duster leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…