DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Dacia 1410 vs 1990 Geo Storm Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Geo Storm

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.5–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Dacia 1410SpecificationGeo Storm
DaciaMakeGeo
1410ModelStorm
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

Dacia 1410SpecificationGeo Storm
—0–100 km/h12,4 s
145 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1397 ccEngine displacement1588 cc
62 HPPower130 HP
100 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Dacia 1410SpecificationGeo Storm
PetrolFuel typePetrol
48 ltFuel tank47 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption13 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8 lt
9,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Dacia 1410SpecificationGeo Storm
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/80 R13 STyre size205/50 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Dacia 1410SpecificationGeo Storm
4340 mmLength4150 mm
1636 mmWidth1695 mm
1430 mmHeight1300 mm
920 KgWeight1010 Kg
2441 mmWheelbase2450 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Dacia 1410 and 1990 Geo Storm approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Geo Storm leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…