DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1991 Dacia 1325 vs 1991 Geo Storm Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Geo Storm

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.5–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Dacia 1325SpecificationGeo Storm
DaciaMakeGeo
1325ModelStorm
1991Model year1991
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

Dacia 1325SpecificationGeo Storm
—0–100 km/h12,4 s
145 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1397 ccEngine displacement1588 cc
62 HPPower130 HP
100 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Dacia 1325SpecificationGeo Storm
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank47 lt
—Urban consumption13 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Dacia 1325SpecificationGeo Storm
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/80 R13 STyre size205/50 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Dacia 1325SpecificationGeo Storm
4151 mmLength4150 mm
1636 mmWidth1695 mm
1430 mmHeight1300 mm
935 KgWeight1010 Kg
2441 mmWheelbase2450 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1991 Dacia 1325 and 1991 Geo Storm approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Geo Storm leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…