DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2018 Cupra TCR vs 2016 Volvo V60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

92.5–93.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Cupra TCRSpecificationVolvo V60
CupraMakeVolvo
TCRModelV60
2018Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeEstate
2Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Cupra TCRSpecificationVolvo V60
5,2 s0–100 km/h4,8 s
267 km/hTop speed250 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1969 cc
350 HPPower367 HP
420 NmTorque470 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Cupra TCRSpecificationVolvo V60
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank67 lt
—Average consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Cupra TCRSpecificationVolvo V60
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6 DSGGears8 Geartronic
—Tyre size245/35 ZR20
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Cupra TCRSpecificationVolvo V60
4363 mmLength4635 mm
—Width1899 mm
—Height1484 mm
1190 KgWeight1796 Kg
2666 mmWheelbase2776 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2018 Cupra TCR and 2016 Volvo V60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…