DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Citroen Xsara vs 1999 Mazda 626 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 626

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

52.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeMazda
XsaraModel626
1999Model year1999
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,9 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
180 km/hTop speed192 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
90 HPPower116 HP
205 NmTorque173 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
54 ltFuel tank64 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption10,8 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4167 mmLength4660 mm
1698 mmWidth1710 mm
1405 mmHeight1515 mm
1100 KgWeight1280 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Citroen Xsara and 1999 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…