DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Citroen Xsara vs 2004 MG ZS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Citroen XsaraSpecificationMG ZS
CitroenMakeMG
XsaraModelZS
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Citroen XsaraSpecificationMG ZS
9,9 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
210 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
132 HPPower113 HP
180 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Citroen XsaraSpecificationMG ZS
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
54 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,4 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Citroen XsaraSpecificationMG ZS
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/55 R15Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Citroen XsaraSpecificationMG ZS
4167 mmLength4520 mm
1698 mmWidth1700 mm
1405 mmHeight1390 mm
1180 KgWeight1225 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Citroen Xsara and 2004 MG ZS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…