2003 • Citroen
Xsara
Citroen Xsara 1.8 i (101 Hp) 2003Overall Score50.25/100
2003 Citroen Xsara vs 2003 Mazda 2 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Mazda
2
Mazda 2 1.6 i 16V (101 Hp) 2003Overall Score51.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 2
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Citroen XsaraSpecificationMazda 2
CitroenMakeMazda
XsaraModel2
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Citroen XsaraSpecificationMazda 2
15,8 s0–100 km/h11,4 s
177 km/hTop speed181 km/h
1762 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
101 HPPower101 HP
153 NmTorque146 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Citroen XsaraSpecificationMazda 2
PetrolFuel typePetrol
54 ltFuel tank45 lt
13 ltUrban consumption9,2 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
—Average consumption6,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Citroen XsaraSpecificationMazda 2
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Citroen XsaraSpecificationMazda 2
4167 mmLength3925 mm
1698 mmWidth1680 mm
1405 mmHeight1545 mm
1070 KgWeight1080 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2490 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Citroen Xsara and 2003 Mazda 2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…