2003 • Citroen
Xsara
Citroen Xsara 1.8 i (101 Hp) 2003Overall Score50.25/100
2003 Citroen Xsara vs 2003 Kia Shuma Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Kia
Shuma
Kia Shuma 1.6 i 16V (101 Hp) 2003Overall Score51.25/100
WINNER
Kia Shuma
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Citroen XsaraSpecificationKia Shuma
CitroenMakeKia
XsaraModelShuma
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Citroen XsaraSpecificationKia Shuma
15,8 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
177 km/hTop speed186 km/h
1762 ccEngine displacement1594 cc
101 HPPower101 HP
153 NmTorque144 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Citroen XsaraSpecificationKia Shuma
PetrolFuel typePetrol
54 ltFuel tank50 lt
13 ltUrban consumption10,7 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Citroen XsaraSpecificationKia Shuma
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Citroen XsaraSpecificationKia Shuma
4167 mmLength4525 mm
1698 mmWidth1720 mm
1405 mmHeight1415 mm
1070 KgWeight1115 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2560 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Citroen Xsara and 2003 Kia Shuma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Shuma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…