DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Citroen Xsara vs 2003 Ford C-Max Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford C-Max

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeFord
XsaraModelC-Max
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeMPV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

15,8 s0–100 km/h12,9 s
177 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1762 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
101 HPPower100 HP
153 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
54 ltFuel tank55 lt
13 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
—Average consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4167 mmLength4330 mm
1698 mmWidth1820 mm
1405 mmHeight1600 mm
1070 KgWeight1234 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Citroen Xsara and 2003 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford C-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…