2002 • Citroen
Xsara
Citroen Xsara 1.8 i (101 Hp) 2002Overall Score50.25/100
2002 Citroen Xsara vs 2002 Daewoo Rezzo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Daewoo
Rezzo
Daewoo Rezzo 1.6 i 16V (106 Hp) 2002Overall Score51.25/100
WINNER
Daewoo Rezzo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Citroen XsaraSpecificationDaewoo Rezzo
CitroenMakeDaewoo
XsaraModelRezzo
2002Model year2002
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
5Doors5
Performance
Citroen XsaraSpecificationDaewoo Rezzo
15,8 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
177 km/hTop speed167 km/h
1762 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
101 HPPower106 HP
153 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Citroen XsaraSpecificationDaewoo Rezzo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
54 ltFuel tank60 lt
13 ltUrban consumption11 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
—Average consumption8,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Citroen XsaraSpecificationDaewoo Rezzo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size185/70 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Citroen XsaraSpecificationDaewoo Rezzo
4167 mmLength4350 mm
1698 mmWidth1755 mm
1405 mmHeight1580 mm
1070 KgWeight1245 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Citroen Xsara and 2002 Daewoo Rezzo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Daewoo Rezzo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…