DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Citroen Xsara vs 2000 Kia Avella Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Avella

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeKia
XsaraModelAvella
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

15,8 s0–100 km/h12,3 s
177 km/hTop speed183 km/h
1762 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
101 HPPower105 HP
153 NmTorque147 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
54 ltFuel tank43 lt
13 ltUrban consumption8,5 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
—Average consumption7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size165/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4167 mmLength4165 mm
1698 mmWidth1665 mm
1405 mmHeight1450 mm
1070 KgWeight930 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2390 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Citroen Xsara and 2000 Kia Avella approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Avella leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…