DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Citroen Xsara vs 2000 Fiat Bravo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Bravo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeFiat
XsaraModelBravo
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

15,8 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
177 km/hTop speed184 km/h
1762 ccEngine displacement1581 cc
101 HPPower103 HP
153 NmTorque144 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
54 ltFuel tank50 lt
13 ltUrban consumption10,8 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

4167 mmLength4025 mm
1698 mmWidth1755 mm
1405 mmHeight1420 mm
1070 KgWeight1025 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Citroen Xsara and 2000 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Bravo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…