2004 • Citroen
Xsara
Citroen Xsara 1.6 HDI FAP (109 Hp) 2004Overall Score57.25/100
2004 Citroen Xsara vs 2004 Nissan Cube Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Nissan
Cube
Nissan Cube 1.5 (109Hp) 2004Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Citroen Xsara
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Citroen XsaraSpecificationNissan Cube
CitroenMakeNissan
XsaraModelCube
2004Model year2004
MinivanBody typeEstate
5Seats—
5Doors—
Performance
Citroen XsaraSpecificationNissan Cube
11,9 s0–100 km/h—
183 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
109 HPPower109 HP
240 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Citroen XsaraSpecificationNissan Cube
DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank45 lt
6,3 ltUrban consumption—
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Citroen XsaraSpecificationNissan Cube
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
185/65 R15Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABS—
Dimensions
Citroen XsaraSpecificationNissan Cube
4257 mmLength3900 mm
1751 mmWidth1670 mm
1637 mmHeight1645 mm
1315 KgWeight1060 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Citroen Xsara and 2004 Nissan Cube approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Citroen Xsara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…