DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Citroen Xsara vs 1999 Fiat Bravo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen Xsara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeFiat
XsaraModelBravo
2000Model year1999
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

14,1 s0–100 km/h13,9 s
175 km/hTop speed168 km/h
1361 ccEngine displacement1370 cc
75 HPPower75 HP
111 NmTorque112 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
54 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption—
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,7 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65R14Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4167 mmLength4025 mm
1698 mmWidth1755 mm
1405 mmHeight1420 mm
955 KgWeight1010 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Citroen Xsara and 1999 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen Xsara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…