DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Citroen Xsara vs 2004 Nissan Micra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Micra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeNissan
XsaraModelMicra
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

16,7 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
164 km/hTop speed172 km/h
1399 ccEngine displacement1386 cc
68 HPPower88 HP
150 NmTorque128 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
54 ltFuel tank46 lt
5,7 ltUrban consumption7,9 lt
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
4,5 ltAverage consumption6,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/55 R15Tyre size175/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4167 mmLength3715 mm
1698 mmWidth1660 mm
1405 mmHeight1525 mm
1120 KgWeight975 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2430 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Citroen Xsara and 2004 Nissan Micra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Micra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…