DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Citroen Xsara vs 2003 Tata Indica Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Tata Indica

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeTata
XsaraModelIndica
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

16,7 s0–100 km/h15,0 s
164 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1399 ccEngine displacement1405 cc
68 HPPower60 HP
150 NmTorque105 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
54 ltFuel tank37 lt
5,7 ltUrban consumption10 lt
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
4,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/55 R15Tyre size155/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4167 mmLength3660 mm
1698 mmWidth1625 mm
1405 mmHeight1485 mm
1120 KgWeight930 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2400 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Citroen Xsara and 2003 Tata Indica approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Tata Indica leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…