DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Citroen Xsara vs 2003 Mazda Demio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Demio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeMazda
XsaraModelDemio
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

16,7 s0–100 km/h14,0 s
164 km/hTop speed151 km/h
1399 ccEngine displacement1323 cc
68 HPPower63 HP
150 NmTorque103 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
54 ltFuel tank43 lt
5,7 ltUrban consumption9 lt
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
4,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/55 R15Tyre size175/60R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

4167 mmLength3815 mm
1698 mmWidth1670 mm
1405 mmHeight1535 mm
1120 KgWeight960 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2390 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Citroen Xsara and 2003 Mazda Demio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Demio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…