DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Citroen Xsara vs 2003 Citroen C3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeCitroen
XsaraModelC3
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

16,7 s0–100 km/h14,2 s
164 km/hTop speed168 km/h
1399 ccEngine displacement1360 cc
68 HPPower73 HP
150 NmTorque120 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
54 ltFuel tank45 lt
5,7 ltUrban consumption8,2 lt
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
4,5 ltAverage consumption6,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/55 R15Tyre size185/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4167 mmLength3850 mm
1698 mmWidth1667 mm
1405 mmHeight1529 mm
1120 KgWeight1005 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2460 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Citroen Xsara and 2003 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…