DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Citroen Xsara vs 2002 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeMazda
XsaraModel323
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

16,7 s0–100 km/h14,2 s
164 km/hTop speed167 km/h
1399 ccEngine displacement1324 cc
68 HPPower73 HP
150 NmTorque108 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
54 ltFuel tank55 lt
5,7 ltUrban consumption9,3 lt
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
4,5 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/55 R15Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4167 mmLength4200 mm
1698 mmWidth1705 mm
1405 mmHeight1410 mm
1120 KgWeight1070 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Citroen Xsara and 2002 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…