DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Citroen XM vs 2000 Renault Safrane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Safrane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

64.5–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeRenault
XMModelSafrane
1999Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

8,4 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
233 km/hTop speed225 km/h
2946 ccEngine displacement2946 cc
190 HPPower190 HP
267 NmTorque267 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
15,9 ltUrban consumption16,7 lt
8,0 ltExtra-urban consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4708 mmLength4768 mm
1794 mmWidth1816 mm
1394 mmHeight1435 mm
1550 KgWeight1580 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2766 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Citroen XM and 2000 Renault Safrane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Safrane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…