DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Citroen XM vs 1996 Audi A6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen XM

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Citroen XMSpecificationAudi A6
CitroenMakeAudi
XMModelA6
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Citroen XMSpecificationAudi A6
12,1 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
201 km/hTop speed196 km/h
2446 ccEngine displacement2309 cc
129 HPPower133 HP
285 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Citroen XMSpecificationAudi A6
DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
10,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption9,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Citroen XMSpecificationAudi A6
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

Citroen XMSpecificationAudi A6
4708 mmLength4797 mm
1794 mmWidth1783 mm
1394 mmHeight1440 mm
1564 KgWeight1440 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2687 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Citroen XM and 1996 Audi A6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen XM leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…