DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Citroen XM vs 1992 Ford Sierra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen XM

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeFord
XMModelSierra
1992Model year1992
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,9 s0–100 km/h—
192 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2088 ccEngine displacement1993 cc
110 HPPower101 HP
243 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption—
5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4710 mmLength4425 mm
1795 mmWidth1694 mm
1385 mmHeight1407 mm
1380 KgWeight—
2850 mmWheelbase2608 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Citroen XM and 1992 Ford Sierra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen XM leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…