DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Citroen XM vs 1990 Jeep Cherokee Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen XM

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

42.25–41.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeJeep
XMModelCherokee
1990Model year1990
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

17,6 s0–100 km/h19,2 s
173 km/hTop speed140 km/h
2138 ccEngine displacement2068 cc
82 HPPower86 HP
147 NmTorque184 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank76 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption—
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,7 ltAverage consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
175/70 R15Tyre size215/70 R15 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4710 mmLength4240 mm
1795 mmWidth1790 mm
1385 mmHeight1630 mm
1305 KgWeight1490 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2576 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Citroen XM and 1990 Jeep Cherokee approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen XM leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…