DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Citroen XM vs 1989 Citroen CX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen XM

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

42.25–41.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeCitroen
XMModelCX
1990Model year1989
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

17,6 s0–100 km/h16,8 s
173 km/hTop speed149 km/h
2138 ccEngine displacement2500 cc
82 HPPower75 HP
147 NmTorque153 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank68 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption8,5 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,0 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
175/70 R15Tyre size195/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4710 mmLength4650 mm
1795 mmWidth1770 mm
1385 mmHeight1360 mm
1305 KgWeight1370 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2845 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Citroen XM and 1989 Citroen CX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen XM leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…