DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Citroen XM vs 1992 Land Rover Defender Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen XM

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

67.5–66.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeLand Rover
XMModelDefender
1992Model year1992
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

202 km/hTop speed130 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2495 cc
145 HPPower107 HP
226 NmTorque255 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
12,7 ltUrban consumption—
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,1 ltAverage consumption11,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4965 mmLength4438 mm
1795 mmWidth1790 mm
1465 mmHeight2035 mm
1500 KgWeight1872 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2794 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Citroen XM and 1992 Land Rover Defender approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen XM leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…