DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Citroen XM vs 1994 Ford Contour Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Contour

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeFord
XMModelContour
1994Model year1994
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h—
212 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1988 cc
145 HPPower132 HP
226 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank61 lt
12,7 ltUrban consumption—
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,9 ltAverage consumption8,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size185/70 R14 V
YesABS—

Dimensions

4710 mmLength4658 mm
1795 mmWidth1749 mm
1385 mmHeight1374 mm
1400 KgWeight1320 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2704 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Citroen XM and 1994 Ford Contour approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Contour leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…