DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Citroen XM vs 1998 Opel Frontera Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Frontera

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeOpel
XMModelFrontera
1998Model year1998
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h13,4 s
205 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2198 cc
132 HPPower136 HP
180 NmTorque202 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank65 lt
13,5 ltUrban consumption14,8 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9,0 lt
—Average consumption11,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4708 mmLength4268 mm
1794 mmWidth1787 mm
1394 mmHeight1692 mm
1395 KgWeight1660 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2462 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Citroen XM and 1998 Opel Frontera approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Frontera leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…