DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Citroen XM vs 1996 Citroen Evasion Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen Evasion

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeCitroen
XMModelEvasion
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h11,4 s
205 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
132 HPPower147 HP
180 NmTorque235 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
13,5 ltUrban consumption—
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption10,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4708 mmLength4454 mm
1794 mmWidth1834 mm
1394 mmHeight1714 mm
1395 KgWeight1575 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2823 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Citroen XM and 1996 Citroen Evasion approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen Evasion leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…