DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Citroen XM vs 1994 Volvo 940 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo 940

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Citroen XMSpecificationVolvo 940
CitroenMakeVolvo
XMModel940
1994Model year1994
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Citroen XMSpecificationVolvo 940
11,9 s0–100 km/h12,1 s
201 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2383 cc
121 HPPower122 HP
172 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Citroen XMSpecificationVolvo 940
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank75 lt
12,8 ltUrban consumption—
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,8 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Citroen XMSpecificationVolvo 940
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size185/65 R15 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Citroen XMSpecificationVolvo 940
4710 mmLength4871 mm
1795 mmWidth1750 mm
1385 mmHeight1411 mm
1310 KgWeight1440 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2770 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Citroen XM and 1994 Volvo 940 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo 940 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…