DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Citroen XM vs 1994 Volvo 480 E Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo 480 E

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeVolvo
XMModel480 E
1994Model year1994
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
201 km/hTop speed191 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
121 HPPower109 HP
172 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank60 lt
12,8 ltUrban consumption—
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,8 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size195/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4710 mmLength4258 mm
1795 mmWidth1710 mm
1385 mmHeight1323 mm
1310 KgWeight1050 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2503 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Citroen XM and 1994 Volvo 480 E approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo 480 E leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…