DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Citroen XM vs 1994 Mazda 626 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 626

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Citroen XMSpecificationMazda 626
CitroenMakeMazda
XMModel626
1994Model year1994
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Citroen XMSpecificationMazda 626
11,9 s0–100 km/h9,7 s
201 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
121 HPPower115 HP
172 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Citroen XMSpecificationMazda 626
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank60 lt
12,8 ltUrban consumption—
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,8 ltAverage consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Citroen XMSpecificationMazda 626
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size195/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Citroen XMSpecificationMazda 626
4710 mmLength4695 mm
1795 mmWidth1750 mm
1385 mmHeight1400 mm
1310 KgWeight1160 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Citroen XM and 1994 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…