DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Citroen XM vs 1990 Saab 9000 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9000

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Citroen XMSpecificationSaab 9000
CitroenMakeSaab
XMModel9000
1990Model year1990
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Citroen XMSpecificationSaab 9000
11,9 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
201 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1985 cc
121 HPPower128 HP
172 NmTorque173 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Citroen XMSpecificationSaab 9000
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank66 lt
12,8 ltUrban consumption12,2 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
8,8 ltAverage consumption8,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Citroen XMSpecificationSaab 9000
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Citroen XMSpecificationSaab 9000
4710 mmLength4794 mm
1795 mmWidth1764 mm
1385 mmHeight1420 mm
1310 KgWeight1490 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2672 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Citroen XM and 1990 Saab 9000 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9000 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…