DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Citroen XM vs 1990 Rover Montego Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover Montego

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeRover
XMModelMontego
1990Model year1990
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
201 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
121 HPPower104 HP
172 NmTorque164 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank50 lt
12,8 ltUrban consumption10 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
8,8 ltAverage consumption7,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size185/65 HR14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4710 mmLength4470 mm
1795 mmWidth1710 mm
1385 mmHeight1420 mm
1310 KgWeight—
2850 mmWheelbase2570 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Citroen XM and 1990 Rover Montego approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover Montego leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…