DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Citroen XM vs 1990 Ford Sierra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Sierra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeFord
XMModelSierra
1990Model year1990
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
201 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
121 HPPower125 HP
172 NmTorque177 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank60 lt
12,8 ltUrban consumption—
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,8 ltAverage consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4710 mmLength4467 mm
1795 mmWidth1698 mm
1385 mmHeight1407 mm
1310 KgWeight1200 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2608 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Citroen XM and 1990 Ford Sierra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Sierra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…