DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Citroen Xantia vs 2000 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen Xantia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeSaab
XantiaModel9-3
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

12,8 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
186 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1985 cc
109 HPPower130 HP
250 NmTorque177 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank68 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4708 mmLength4629 mm
1794 mmWidth1711 mm
1394 mmHeight1428 mm
1485 KgWeight1295 Kg
2470 mmWheelbase2605 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Citroen Xantia and 2000 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen Xantia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…