DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Citroen SpaceTourer vs 2016 Skoda Superb Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen SpaceTourer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

73.5–72.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeSkoda
SpaceTourerModelSuperb
2016Model year2016
Minivan, MPVBody typeLiftback
6/9Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,8-10.5 s0–100 km/h8,0 s
170 km/hTop speed232 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
177 HPPower180 HP
400 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
69 ltFuel tank66 lt
6,1 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption6,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/65 R16; 225/55 R17; 215/60 R17Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4956 mmLength4861 mm
1920 mmWidth1864 mm
1930 mmHeight1468 mm
1655-1871 KgWeight1390 Kg
3275 mmWheelbase2841 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Citroen SpaceTourer and 2016 Skoda Superb approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen SpaceTourer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…