DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Citroen SpaceTourer vs 2016 Skoda Kodiaq Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen SpaceTourer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

73.5–72.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeSkoda
SpaceTourerModelKodiaq
2016Model year2016
Minivan, MPVBody typeSUV
6/9Seats5/7
5Doors5

Performance

9,8-10.5 s0–100 km/h7,8 s
170 km/hTop speed206 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
177 HPPower180 HP
400 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
69 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,1 ltUrban consumption9,0 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears7 DSG
215/65 R16; 225/55 R17; 215/60 R17Tyre size215/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4956 mmLength4697 mm
1920 mmWidth1882 mm
1930 mmHeight1655 mm
1655-1871 KgWeight1632/1669 Kg
3275 mmWheelbase2791 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Citroen SpaceTourer and 2016 Skoda Kodiaq approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen SpaceTourer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…