DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Citroen Saxo vs 2000 Peugeot 106 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Peugeot 106

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakePeugeot
SaxoModel106
1998Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3/5

Performance

12,9 s0–100 km/h13,2 s
175 km/hTop speed178 km/h
1361 ccEngine displacement1361 cc
75 HPPower75 HP
111 NmTorque111 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank45 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption9,4 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R13Tyre size165/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3718 mmLength3678 mm
1595 mmWidth1594 mm
1390 mmHeight1376 mm
840 KgWeight815 Kg
2385 mmWheelbase2385 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Citroen Saxo and 2000 Peugeot 106 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Peugeot 106 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…