2000 • Citroen
Saxo
Citroen Saxo 1.1 X,SX (60 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
2000 Citroen Saxo vs 1995 Rover 100 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1995 • Rover
100
Rover 100 1995Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Citroen Saxo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Citroen SaxoSpecificationRover 100
CitroenMakeRover
SaxoModel100
2000Model year1995
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3/5
Performance
Citroen SaxoSpecificationRover 100
14,9 s0–100 km/h14,8 s
162 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1124 ccEngine displacement1119 cc
60 HPPower60 HP
94 NmTorque90 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Citroen SaxoSpecificationRover 100
PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank35 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption7,1 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption6,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Citroen SaxoSpecificationRover 100
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/65 R14Tyre size155/65 R13
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Citroen SaxoSpecificationRover 100
3718 mmLength3521 mm
1595 mmWidth1550 mm
1390 mmHeight1377 mm
780 KgWeight840 Kg
2385 mmWheelbase2269 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Citroen Saxo and 1995 Rover 100 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Citroen Saxo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…