2000 • Citroen
Saxo
Citroen Saxo 1.1 X,SX (60 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
2000 Citroen Saxo vs 1995 Fiat Cinquecento Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1995 • Fiat
Cinquecento
Fiat Cinquecento 1.1 Sporting (54 Hp) 1995Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Citroen Saxo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Citroen SaxoSpecificationFiat Cinquecento
CitroenMakeFiat
SaxoModelCinquecento
2000Model year1995
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3
Performance
Citroen SaxoSpecificationFiat Cinquecento
14,9 s0–100 km/h13,8 s
162 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1124 ccEngine displacement1108 cc
60 HPPower54 HP
94 NmTorque88 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Citroen SaxoSpecificationFiat Cinquecento
PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank35 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption—
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,1 ltAverage consumption6,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Citroen SaxoSpecificationFiat Cinquecento
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/65 R14Tyre size155/65 R13
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Citroen SaxoSpecificationFiat Cinquecento
3718 mmLength3227 mm
1595 mmWidth1487 mm
1390 mmHeight1435 mm
780 KgWeight735 Kg
2385 mmWheelbase2200 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Citroen Saxo and 1995 Fiat Cinquecento approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Citroen Saxo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…